HomeNewsUrban DesignRachel Forster site community meeting

Rachel Forster site community meeting

With virtually no reference to the existing buildings, the current proposal was compared to the plans approved under the Redfern-Waterloo Act of the previous NSW government. As there had been very little consultation with the community in the development of these plans, the comparison had little meaning. Diagrams outlining the existing buildings – which the community know well – would have enabled a much better understanding of what is intended.

The consultants noted that the current plans generally complied with the Approval, with the “minor” exceptions of: An additional 9 apartments achieved through removing the crossover apartments (which enable good cross ventilation); The removal of all 3 bedroom apartments (which the consultants did not seem to realise); A change to the north-east corner of the building resulting in the removal of the jacaranda tree; A reduction in the setback of the upper floor from Pitt Street; An increase in the size of the balconies to the south, overlooking the neighbouring houses.

Also of great concern was the current management of the site – or lack thereof. Significantly, it was noted that the “security” measures are totally ineffectual, resulting in the occupation by approximately 20 squatters who, amongst other things, are throwing dangerous asbestos into the neighbouring properties and ignoring the theft of copper downpipes and gutters (essential for the retention of the existing buildings) by those appointed by the developers to “secure” the premises (now not working for them as they noted).

The developers, who sat unacknowledged at the back of the room and were absent at many crucial points, seemed disinterested in these issues, except to point out they were doing all that was required.

It was obvious that for any development in this suburb, that has a great past and a strong future, consultation with the community is essential. This will harness their experience and knowledge in bringing local relevance and buy-in to any scheme. It will also bring great financial advantage to the developers who will benefit from this free intelligence to produce a product that will be well received by potential purchasers, while reducing the time for consideration and approval. Failure to recognise this will see the opposite, as this strident community stands up for what this great place deserves.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

spot_img
- Advertisment -spot_img
- Advertisment -spot_img

Burning bright – the life and legacy of Father Chris Riley

Father Chris Riley AM (1954-2025) grew up on a dairy farm in Echuca, Victoria, before answering a vocation inspired by the 1938 film, Boys’ Town. At 15, he resolved to become a priest to care for young people cast aside by society.

Waves of Wisdom – trivia tackles Australia’s nature crisis

Last Saturday afternoon, August 2, the Maroubra Surf Life Saving Club came alive with laughter, friendly competition and ...

The Battle for Waterloo – a resident’s perspective

I have lived in Matavai since 2010 and am a survivor of a decade of so-called government consultation since Brad Hazzard first announced the Metro and the redevelopment of the Waterloo Estate.

No bull, Seamus is big hit

Who would believe that the latest star of YouTube is a charismatic bull named Seamus?

More than pets – portraits of love

I caught the Why We Love Our Pets exhibition on its very last day (April 29), just before the photographs were taken down. And I’m so glad I did.

A ministry concludes

After 18 years with the South Sydney Uniting Church (SSUC), which publishes the South Sydney Herald, March 30 marked the closure of ministry for the Rev. Andrew Collis.