HomeNewsUrban DesignSocial housing refurbishment vs redevelopment

Social housing refurbishment vs redevelopment

WATERLOO: Refurbishing the Matavai and Turanga towers could cost around half as much as rebuilding the same number of new apartments, according to a study by the not-for-profit architecture firm OFFICE.

Its proposal is to add prefabricated modules containing a bedroom and balcony on each corner of the buildings, turning bedsits into one-bedroom apartments.

For the Marton, Solander, Banks and Cook high-rise buildings, OFFICE suggests adding new balconies to the exteriors while internally breaking each building into three serviced by new external lifts. These changes would cost about 63% of a new build.

For all buildings the costs include service upgrades, new kitchens and bathrooms with over 80% reduction in energy usage through double-glazed windows, insulation as well as heating and cooling upgrades.

The community pushed for these buildings to be upgraded in the 2012 redevelopment plans. One of the 2019 Waterloo redevelopment options retained Matavai and Turanga and the City of Sydney plan proposed adaption rather than knockdown and rebuild.

The recent study underlines the feasibility of such an approach with the possibility of infill housing around the existing buildings.

The current Waterloo model delivers 30% new social housing paid for by the rest of the redevelopment. The same approach in North and Central needs a development of 4,200 units to replace the existing 1,260 high-rise units.

On OFFICE’s refurbishment figures, no loss of units is achieved at the cost of 790 new homes and so the total development would only need to be around 2,630 units to fund the upgrade.

OFFICE’s infill proposal at about 3,000 exceeds that required to make the Homes NSW model financially viable but it would not necessarily meet Homes NSW’s “deconcentrating” objective.

One weakness in the report is the proposed relocation cost savings. With the Waterloo redevelopment expecting to relocate tenants into newly built housing by the time the high-rises are developed, there seems no basis for the suggested cost savings in Waterloo.

You can download the full report here.

You can also read the launch reflections of Waterloo resident Catherine Skipper on her almost 10-year Waterloo redevelopment journey here.

Homes NSW say they will not look at redeveloping the high-rises for at least 10 years.

_______________
Geoff Turnbull is the Spokesperson for REDWatch, which supported the OFFICE study grant from the City of Sydney.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

spot_img
- Advertisment -spot_img
- Advertisment -spot_img

Burning bright – the life and legacy of Father Chris Riley

Father Chris Riley AM (1954-2025) grew up on a dairy farm in Echuca, Victoria, before answering a vocation inspired by the 1938 film, Boys’ Town. At 15, he resolved to become a priest to care for young people cast aside by society.

Waves of Wisdom – trivia tackles Australia’s nature crisis

Last Saturday afternoon, August 2, the Maroubra Surf Life Saving Club came alive with laughter, friendly competition and ...

The Battle for Waterloo – a resident’s perspective

I have lived in Matavai since 2010 and am a survivor of a decade of so-called government consultation since Brad Hazzard first announced the Metro and the redevelopment of the Waterloo Estate.

No bull, Seamus is big hit

Who would believe that the latest star of YouTube is a charismatic bull named Seamus?

More than pets – portraits of love

I caught the Why We Love Our Pets exhibition on its very last day (April 29), just before the photographs were taken down. And I’m so glad I did.

A ministry concludes

After 18 years with the South Sydney Uniting Church (SSUC), which publishes the South Sydney Herald, March 30 marked the closure of ministry for the Rev. Andrew Collis.